Public Policies in the Science Field and the “divide et impera” Issue

Luigi Lai

Data publikacji : 2017-01-23

Tom 7 Nr 20 (2016)

Public Policies in the Science Field and the “divide et impera” Issue

Luigi Lai

Dział: ARTYKUŁY VARIA/ARTICLES VARIA

Abstrakt

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to present the main characteristics of the science public policies in France, Italy and Spain and at the same time the article aims at showing that it is need a strong state coordination over the public R&D stakeholders so to increase efficiency.

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The presented research problem concerns the effects of the so called multilevel governance on the science public policies in France, Italy and Spain. The methodology applied consists in the analyses of main pieces of legislation of France, Spain and Italy and the observation of the main consequences on the fundamental G.E.R.D. statistics, combined with the analysis of the reference literature.

THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The argumentative process of this paper is so divided: it is given to every state a section of the paper; The analysis of the countries systems starts with France, being France the country with the strongest state control; then Spain and Italy.

RESEARCH RESULTS: Spain presents the most interesting approach to R&D considered the percent of GDP dedicated to R&D and the obtained results; thanks to the important role played by Inter Ministerial Commission on Science and Technology.

CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: State control over science public policies is still very needed in order to define policies priorities. The form of this control changed in the time but it is still present; even if an initial analysis could produce in the reader the sensation that nowadays the French, Italian and Spanish science public policies are without a relevant state control; under a more prudent analysis, it is perceptible how the central government’s hand is still strong and powerful. Central governments still use their steering power (Imperium); but this power is now put into use in a less coercive way.

Słowa kluczowe

innovation ; innovation policies ; B R

Szczegóły

Bibliografia

Statystyki

Autorzy

Pobierz pliki

PDF

Zasady cytowania

Wskaźniki altmetryczne

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Uwagi dotyczące praw autorskich

Autorzy publikujący w tym czasopiśmie wyrażają zgodę na następując warunki:

Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie, przyznając czasopismu prawo do pierwszej publikacji swojego tekstu jednocześnie zarejestrowanego pod numerem licencji CC BY-ND, która pozwala innym na korzystanie z tego tekstu z uznaniem autorstwa tekstu oraz pierwotnej publikacji w tym czasopiśmie.
Autorzy proszeni są o nawiązywanie odrębnych, dodatkowych porozumień wynikających z umowy, dotyczących dystrybucji opublikowanej w czasopiśmie wersji tekstu nie na prawach wyłączności (np. opublikowanie go w repozytorium instytucji lub w innym czasopiśmie), z potwierdzeniem pierwszej publikacji w tym czasopiśmie.

Wyraża się zgodę i zachęca autorów do publikacji ich tekstu w Internecie (np. w repozytorium instytucji lub na jej stronie internetowej) przed lub podczas procesu składania tekstu jako, że może to prowadzić do korzystnych wymian oraz wcześniejszego i większego cytowania opublikowanego tekstu (Patrz The Effect of Open Access). Zalecamy wykorzystanie dowolnego portalu stowarzyszeń badawczych z niżej wymienionych:

Bibliografia

Archibugi, D. (2000). Technological globalisation or national systems of innovation. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Beatson, M. (2007, September). CREST 3% OMC Third Cycle Policy Mix Peer Review Country Report France.

Belussi, F. (2004). The Italian system of innovation: the gradual transition from a weak “mission oriented” system to a regionalised learning system. Elsevier: Research Policies.

Bertamino, F. (2011). Local Policies For Innovation: The Case Of Technology Districts in Italy. Banca d’Italia Rome.

Boudon, J. (2014). Autres Collections: Manuel de droit constitutionnel. Tome I. Paris: Puf.

Boudon, J. (2015). Autres Collections: Manuel de droit constitutionnel. Tome II. Paris: Puf.

Buesa, M. (2014). Regional System of Innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case. Madrid: University Complutense.

Coletti, R. (2007). Italy and innovation: organisational structure and public policies. Rome: Cespi.

Cooke, P. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Cooke, P. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Pion Publication England.

Cooke, P. (2004). The role of research in regional innovation systems: new models meeting knowledge economy demands. England.

Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475 491. doi:10.1016/S0048 7333(97)00025 5. Elsevier Amsterdam.

Directorate General for Research and Innovation. (2014). Research and Innovation performance in Country Profile France. European Commission Bruxelles.

Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M.S. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so called “European Paradox.” Research Policy, Triple helix Indicators of Knowledge Based Innovation Systems 35, 1450 1464. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.012. Elsevier Amsterdam.

Dosso, M. (2014). Restructuring in France’s innovation system: from the mission – oriented model to systemic approach of innovation. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Sevilla: Joint Research Centre, European Commission.

Draetta, U. (2015). Elementi di diritto dell’Unione Europea. Turin: Giuffre.

Erawatch Spanish National R&D&i Plan 2008 2011 (+2012) [WWW Document], n.d. Retrived from: http://erawatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/erawatch/ opencms/information/country_pages/es/policydocument/policydoc_ mig_0008 (access: 14.09.2015).

European Commission. (2014). Research and Innovation performance Innovation Union progress at country level in the EU.

European Commission. (2014). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015.

European Commission, Directorate General Enterprise & Industry. (2014). Country Report Italy: regional aspects of KETs deployment.

European Commission, Directorate General Regional Policy. (2010). Expert Evaluation Network Delivering Policy Analysis on the Performance Of Cohesion Policy 2007 2013 Task 1: Policy Paper on Innovation.

European Parliament. (2015). The Principle of Subsidiarity [WWW Document]. The Subsidiarity Principle in the EU. Retrived from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/atyourservice/en/displayFtu.ht-ml?ftuId=FTU_1.2.2.html (access: 30.10.2015).

European Union Committee of the Regions of the European Union. (2009). The White Paper on multi level governance.

Fischer, A. (2000). Innovation, Knowledge Creation and Systems of Innovation. The Annals of Regional Science.

French Ministry for external Affairs. (2010). MAE Stratégie innovation v anglaise.indd.

Furtado, A. (1996). The French system of innovation in the oil industry some lessons about the role of public policies and sectoral patterns of technological change in innovation networking. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/902839/The_French_system_of_innovation_in_the_oil_industry_some_lessons_about_the_role_of_public_policies_and_sectoral_patterns_of_technological_change_in_innovation_networking (access: 10.12.2016).

Galia, F. (2012). Obstacles to innovation: what hampers innovation in France and Italy? Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.477.4363&rep=rep1&type=pdf (access: 10.12.2016).

Gillies, D. (2007). Lessons from the History and Philosophy of Science regarding the Research Assessment Exercise. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 61, 37 73. Retrieved from: http://discovery.ucl. ac.uk/16516/ (access: 10.12.2016).

Gregersen, B. (2010). The public sector as a pacer in national systems. In National Systems of Innovation. Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London and New York: Anthem Press.

Guichard, R. (2003). Suggested repositioning of defence R&D within the French system of innovation. Retrieved from: http://www.nathalie lazaric.fr/pdf/Changes_in_the_French_Defence_ionnovation_System.pdf (access: 10.12.2016).

Gutiérrez Lousa, M. (2008). Los incentivos fiscales a la innovación. Su situación en España. Retrieved from: http://eco.mdp.edu.ar/cendocu/ repositorio/00875.pdf (access: 10.12.2016).

Hughes, A., Kitson, M., Probert, J., Bullock, A., & Milner, I. (2011). Hidden Connections. Knowledge exchange between the arts and humanities and the private, public and third sectors. Cambridge: Arts & Humanities Research Council.

Independent Expert Group Report prepared for the Spanish Ministry of Economy. (2014). Peer Review of the Spanish Research and Innovation System.

ISTAT. (2014). Research and development In Italy.

Italian government. (2014). Programma Nazionale per La Ricerca 2014 2020.

Kelsen, H. (1991). General Theory of Norms. Oxford England – New York: Clarendon Press.

Lanciano, C. (2000). A Comparative Study of R&D Staff in France and Japan Skill Formation, Career Patterns and Organisational Creation of Knowledge. Retrieved from: https://cordis.europa.eu/pub/improving/docs/ ser_conf_bench_nohara.pdf (access: 10.12.2016).

Lane, J.-E. (2000). New Public Management. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/New Public Management An Introduction/Lane/p/book/9780415231879 (access: 10.12.2016).

Laredo, P. (2001). Research and innovation policies in the new global economy. Retrieved from: http://ifris.org/wp content/blogs.dir/1/files/2014/10/35.-Chap._01_and_14.pdf (access: 10.12.2016).

Lazaric, N. (2009). Changes in the French defence innovation system: New roles and capabilities for the Government Agency for Defence. Retrieved from: https://halshs.archives ouvertes.fr/hal-00599727/document (access: 10.12.2016).

Lovaris. (2014). Droit administratif [WWW Document]. Retrived from: http://www.puf.com/Autres_Collections:Droit_administratif_%282%29 (access: 09.09.2015).

Mazzarol, T. (2008). The French National Innovation System: An International Comparison from the Small Firms’ Perspective. Retrieved from: http://www.kmu hsg.ch/rencontres/Renc2008/Topics_2008/D/Ren-contres_2008_Reboud_Mazzarol_Volery_f.pdf

Miossec, J.-M. (2009). Quadrige:Géohistoire de la régionalisation en France. Paris: Puf.

Modena, V. (2001). The Italian Innovation System. University of Pavia.

Morbidelli, G. (2014). Diritto pubblico comparato. Torino: Giappichelli.

Muñoz, E. (2006). The Spanish system of research. Research and innovation in Spain. Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados(CSIC, Madrid).

Muro, M. (2015). Rightsizing the Region: France Redraws its Map [WWW Document]. The Brookings Institution. Retrived from: http://www. brookings.edu/blogs/the avenue/posts/2014/12/09-region france map muro fikri (access: 09.09.2015).

Mytelka, L. (2000). Local Clusters, Innovation Systems and Sustained Competitiveness. United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Napolitano, G. (2007). Diritto amministrativo comparato. Turin: Giuffre.

Navarro, M. (2009). Typologies of innovation based on statistical analysis for European and Spanish regions. San Sebastian: Basque Institute of Competitiveness.

Niosi, J. (2000). Regional systems of innovation Market pull and government push. A presentation to the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Research Network on Regional Innovation Systems. Montreal.

OECD. (1997). National Innovation Systems.

Office of the Prime Minister. (2012). Summary of French regions’ regional innovation strategies.

Padua University. (2005). The Italian innovation system and its potential for high tech start ups.

Pasquier, R. (2003). La régionalisation française revisitée : fédéralisme, mouvement régional et élites modernisatrices (1950 1964). Revue française de science politique, 1, vol. 53, 101 125.

Piattoni, S. (2009). Multi level governance in the EU. Does it Work?. Journal of European Integration.

Piettre, A. (1986). Colbertisme et dirigsme. Retrived from: http://rddm. revuedesdeuxmondes.fr/archive/article.php?code=17974 (access: 110.12.2016).

Queipo Rodriguez, P. (2014). European experiences: Spain.

Reppy, J. (2000). The Place of the Defense Industry in National Systems of Innovation. Cornell University Peace Studies Program.

Rich, E.E., & Cole, C.W. (1964). Colbert and a Century of French Mercantilism. The Economic History Review, 10, 164. doi:10.2307/2590799.

Rothbard, M. (2010). Jean Baptiste Colbert [WWW Document]. Mises Institute. Retrived from: https://mises.org/library/jean baptiste colbert (access: 10.09.2015).

Rothbard, M. (2012). Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought (2 volume set).

Rothbard, M. (n.d). Jean Baptiste Colbert. Auburn, Alabama: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.